Belly Dancing for Tax-Funded Events, Do or Don't?

Maybe some of you remember that whole Philadelphia Housing Authority story, where tax-payers ended up footing the bill for a diversity party that included belly dancers.

I don't want to go into the whole controversy (you can check out Dilara's feedback here), but one of the dancers involved in the performance has finally had her say.

To give you some context for this article, here's my paraphrase:

Belly dancers (plus various other acts) performed at a party for an agency. The director of said agency is considered very corrupt, and is facing heat regarding mismanaged funds. This controversy has been referenced in many articles, mostly focusing on the belly dancers as opposed to the other performers. Having been featured (in picture) on many of these articles without credit or permission, one of the dancers in the troupe has commented on an Examiner.com article. The author of that article (Aaron Proctor) responds in an article of his own.

I'm going to skip most of the post, because really, I don't live in the area, and since I'm not a performer, I can't fully understand where she is coming from , but what I do love in her post are these words:

"However, one's job before a show is not arguing politics with your dance director. It's to arrive on time with costume, makeup and props in good order, making sure you're on stage fully in character, and performing to the best of your ability. It seems that I held up my end of the bargain."

Continue reading on Examiner.com

 

She makes a really good point. Dancers aren't responsible for the actions of the venues they perform at, nor should they expect to be held as part of an example for bad behavior when really, they did the job they were paid for. Why should they apologize when they couldn't have known where the money came from?

 

The author of the article makes a good point: "It would be the same thing as if Mayor Nutter had a $5,000 party on your dime and then we all blamed the DJ who was hired." (Thank you, Mr. Proctor, for finally writing that the focus of this issue shouldn't be the belly dancers, but the mismanaged funds).

With that being said, I wanted to ask if any dancers have performed at state/federal agency events before. Would you stop to ask if your payment was tax-funded before performing? Or does that matter?

Since I'm not a performer myself, I really don't have an opinion on the matter. What's yours?